An AI never approves
Breakspec’s AI can suggest rules, but only a person can approve them, and only approved rules can stop a merge.
Compare · Checked 12 October 2026
Copilot code review is built into GitHub. It reviews pull requests, suggests fixes, and can pass them to Copilot’s coding agent. GitHub’s own docs say it “is not guaranteed to spot all problems”. Breakspec gives you something you can check for yourself: an example that fails.
Breakspec’s AI can suggest rules, but only a person can approve them, and only approved rules can stop a merge.
Rechecking uses the same examples and no AI, so the same code always gets the same result.
Breakspec runs from your terminal, before each commit, in any CI, and inside Claude Code, Cursor or Codex.
| GitHub Copilot code review | Breakspec | |
|---|---|---|
| How it finds bugs | An AI reads the change | Runs your code on hundreds of examples |
| What you get back | A comment about what might be wrong | An example that breaks your code, which you can run yourself |
| Who decides what “correct” means | The AI, guided by your instructions | You, by approving rules |
| Cost of checking every pull request | $0.05 to $5 per review, by GitHub’s estimate | No AI cost. Rechecking doesn’t use AI |
| Can it block a merge? | It can approve one, if you turn that on | Yes, when one of your approved rules breaks |
| After a fix | Reviews the new code again | Reruns the example that failed, and notices if the fix cheats |
Yes. Let Copilot review the pull request, and let Breakspec check that the logic is right, with an example to show it.
Checked on 12 October 2026, from GitHub Copilot code review’s own docs and pricing pages. Prices and features change; if something here is out of date, tell us at sales@breakspec.com and we’ll fix it.